It’s time to walk back from Measure 110 debacle

Too often an excuse is made that a problem cannot be solved because the wrong solution was initially implemented. This is flawed thinking.

In the case of Measure 110, the obvious fix is to recognize the drug law for what is. In the Rogue Valley Times, Commissioner Rick Dyer called it an “utter failure.”

In the article, the commissioner’s statement is taken a step further by pointing out that not only has Measure 110 failed to stop the escalating drug addiction in our state, the horrific statistics illustrate the tragedy the policy has had on a growing number of individuals now in the grip of addiction and the awful numbers of overdoses.

It is my belief that in November of 2020, many Oregon voters were duped into believing Measure 110 was a law that would increase substance abuse treatment options for those seeking help from addiction. The language of the measure was intentionally misleading, and the predictable reality is that decriminalization of drugs has led to wider-spread abuse.

How can we continue to turn a blind eye to this heartbreaking trend? Lawmakers must immediately walk back the trail of decision-making that led to this debacle in order to ensure the welfare of their constituency and prevent future unnecessary loss of life. 

Leslie Ghiglieri / Central Point

Nurse practitioners are worthy of having our trust

I am writing in response to the “Our View” on the shortage of family doctors. While it is certainly food for thought and factually represents a true concern, I have only had good experiences with nurse practitioners.  I find them to be very good listeners, patient, and not in a hurry to rush from the examination room. 

I have had three nurse practitioners since arriving in Medford. The first, while not an oncology specialist, correctly diagnosed a very small spot as skin cancer.  Just as a primary care physician would, she tracked my high blood pressure and took care of other health-related concerns. Unfortunately, she moved to an out of network group in Ashland.  

Enter No. 2: She worked with cardiology to diagnose my AVNRT (frighteningly fast heart beat not associated with exertion). She took an opportunity in Portland.  

No. 3 is my husband’s nurse practitioner. He had episodes of passing out and general malaise. She worked tirelessly with cardiology, a pharmacist, and screening and testing groups. It was diagnosed he had a faulty lead on his pacemaker. 

Her efforts contributed to, literally, saving his life. When I asked if she could take me as a patient, I jokingly asked if she had plans to leave Medford. She is a keeper. I trust my life in her hands.

I count my blessings that I cannot relate to the Editorial Board’s comment, “Because, let’s face it folks, nurse practitioners are not doctors. They have much less schooling and far less vigorous training.”  

Kathy Partch / Medford